Hear and Listen: Easy confusion

Question from Khadija in Morocco:

What is the difference between ‘hear’ and ‘listen’?

Answer:

Hi, Khadija. Thank’s for your question, I’m sure that the difference between ‘listen‘ and ‘hear‘ is not clear for a lot of English language learners.
Let’s have a look at them:

Listen is used to talk about or describe sounds that are being made around you and which you are making an active effort to focus on. For example:

  • Did you listen to the news last night on television?
  • She was listening to music on her iPod when I walked in.
  • Mike listened to his teacher and then repeated what she had said.
  • ‘Just listen to yourself! You talk such rubbish!’, she said angrily.

Note that ‘listen‘ is nearly always followed by ‘to‘ – you listen to some sound.

Just to repeat an important point; listening is active – that is you are making an active effort to listen to the sound.

Hear is used for sounds that come to our ears, but we do not, unlike listen, need to be actively engaged in trying to listen to the sound – it can just come to your ears! For example:

  • Mike heard a bang in the night which woke him up.
  • She heard someone screaming and called the police.
  • I heard a loud explosion and then the building collapsed.

Note that ‘hear’ is not followed by ‘to’. But, to make it a little more complicated let’s look at this conversation:

  • ‘Did you hear what I said’, asked John’s father.
  • ‘No, I wasn’t listening‘, replied John.
  • ‘Well, if you don’t listen you will never hear what I am telling you!’.

Now, that last sentence seems a little confused but also shows cleary how the two verbs are used – in this case, if John does not make an active effort to listen he will not hear his father’s advice (even if he may have heard sounds his father was making!)

Where hear and listen may seem very close is when you hear something like:

  • Did you hear about Jane? She got married!
  • I heard about the accident but I didn’t see it.

This is when information is passed to you from another source without you necessarily seeking it – in this case note that ‘hear’ is followed by ‘about’ – ‘to hear about’ something, someone or some action or event.

So, you can hear something without wanting to, but you can only listen to something intentionally.

Why be Passive?: Forming the Passive in English

[display_podcast]
Question from Christy in the Philippines

When do we have to use the past participle of the verb when the tense of your statement is in the present tense. This is because I get confused when someone asks me about this. Like for ex. I think your headset is broken. I know this sentence is write, but why use past participle (broken). Thanks

Hi Christy, thanks for your question. English can be confusing and I think you’ve landed on one of the areas that is most confusing for a lot of English language learners. Let’s take a look at your example sentence:

  • I think your headset is broken

Now what is that? Simple Present? Simple Past? Present Perfect? The sentence seems to be in the Present … but what is that past participle ‘broken’ doing in there?.Well, this sentence is in the Passive and that changes the way we structure the tenses.

We use the Passive form:

  • when the agent (the persons or thing performing the action) is known or is not important.In the following sentence we are not concerned about WHO is producing the Champagne.
    • E.G. Champagne is produced in France.
  • to focus attention on the result of an action. This fits your sentence where the important thing to focus on is not WHO broke the headset or WHY the headset is broken but the fact that it IS broken:
    • E.G. I think your headset is broken
  • to hide the identity of the person performing the action. The writer or speaker is being tactful, secretive or evasive.
    • E.G. The new building was built using sub-standard materials.
  • to keep the same grammatical subject.
    • E.G. Michael won the chess game with Jane but was beaten by Max in the finals.

How to form the passive

Now, how do we make a sentence Passive? Let’s have a look at how we re-organize the tense structure (table taken from the English4Today English Grammar). Try and change these Passive examples into active sentences. I’ll do the first one for you:

  • Passive: The house is cleaned every day.Active: I clean the house every day.

Remember, the Passive uses the SUBJECT + TO BE + PAST PARTICIPLE

Subject verb ‘to be’ past participle
Simple present:
The house is cleaned every day.
Present continuous:
The house is being cleaned at the moment.
Simple past:
The house was cleaned yesterday.
Past continuous:
The house was being cleaned last week.
Present perfect:
The house has been cleaned since you left.
Past perfect:
The house had been cleaned before their arrival.
Future:
The house will be cleaned next week.
Future continuous:
The house will be being cleaned tomorrow.
Present conditional:
The house would be cleaned if they had visitors.
Past conditional:
The house would have been cleaned if it had been dirty.

Check out the section of the Passive in the English4Today Grammar for more information.

Nouns, Adjectives … and what about the verb?

[display_podcast]

Question from George in the USA:

Is it correct to say:
And now, a wide variety of ENERGY STAR appliances qualify for Hawaiian Electric Rebates.’
Or is it more correct to say:
‘And now, a wide variety of ENERGY STAR appliances qualifies for Hawaiian Electric Rebates.’

Hello George. The noun phrase in your example is plural – ‘a wide variety of ENERGY STAR appliances‘ – therefore the verb ‘to qualify’ should be in the plural form as well which makes your first sentence:

  • And now, a wide variety of ENERGY STAR appliances qualify for Hawaiian Electric Rebates.

What is a little confusing in this sentence is that the qualifying adjective phrase – a wide variety - starting with the indefinite article ‘a‘ may make you think that you should use the singular verb form for the entire noun phrase. However, ‘appliances’ is plural (with, of course, ‘appliance’ as its singular form) and it is the noun here rather than the adjective which determines the form of the verb. For example:

  • A huge variety of insects live in the Amazon Basin.

Hope that has helped!

Making the Negative with ‘DO’

[display_podcast]

Question from Rick in the USA

Why do we say “I did not meet him” rather than “I did not met him”, since this is the past tense?

Hi Rick. I’m going to answer this one although the answer is explained in the English4Today Online Grammar under the section dealing with forming the negative.

Let’s do a quick review of how the negative is formed in English. First we’ll take your sentence in the affirmative:

  • I met him.

That’s fine… we have the verb in the Simple Past (don’t forget that ‘meet’ is an irregular verb and the past form is ‘met’). Now let’s make it negative. To make the sentence negative we have to use:

SUBJECT + DID + NOT + INFINITIVE OR BASE FORM OF THE VERB WITHOUT ‘TO’

I DID NOT MEET HIM.

What you need to remember here is that the auxiliary verb ‘DO’ is the one that carries the tense – that is, if we are using the Simple Past, as in the original sentence, then DO becomes DID. But the main verb ‘MEET’ stays in the infinitive – that is in its base form without ‘to’ – and is not put into the Simple Past.

Try making this one negative:

  • She went to Rome last month.

OK … you should have written:

  • She DID NOT GO (or ‘didn’t go’) to Rome last month.

If you’re still not sure, have a look through the English4Today Online English Grammar section on forming the negative.

Simple Present or Present Continuous?

[display_podcast]
Question:

What is the correct form: He is a student, but he (isn’t going, doesn’t go) to school right now because it’s the summer holiday?

Hi Alshoala, your question is really about the use of the Simple Present and the Present Continuous. I’d suggest that you have a look at the English4Today Grammar sections for these two tenses and also download the free English4Today Quick Verb Guide as there is a lot of material, explanations and examples in there to help you understand how these two tenses are used.

For your sentence, the first clause, ‘he is a student‘ is perfectly correct – you are using the Simple Present for a statement of fact. However, you then want to say what he is doing at the moment (right now) that is, during these summer holidays. For this part of your sentence you would use your first option in the Present Continuous – ‘ he isn’t going to school‘ as we use this tense to talk about an action that is happening ‘right now’.

  • He is a student, but he isn’t going to school right now because it’s the summer holiday.

If you were to use the Simple Present (your second option, ‘doesn’t go‘) it would have to be in a different context and not to talk about what he is doing right now. For example:

  • He is a student but he doesn’t go to school – he studies online.

This is a statement of fact rather than an indication of what is happening now.

Hope that has helped!

Could I … Would I … understand what it means?

[display_podcast]
Question from Mahesh in India:

What is the difference between ‘would’ and ‘could’?

Hi Mahesh. This is a very common question and there seems to be a lot of confusion about what the difference is exactly between ‘would’ and ‘could’.

Let’s take a look at ‘would’ first:

‘Would’ for Unreal, Impossible or Hypothetical Situations

We probably see this most often in conditional sentences where we want to talk about a situation that is either not real or not likely to occur now or in the future. To do this we use a past tense of the verb in the if-clause and would + infinitive in the main clause. Have a look at these examples:

  • If I knew how to speak French, I would visit France.
  • If she travelled by train, she would arrive this afternoon.

Would and CouldContracting ‘Would’

Don’t forget that you can contract ‘would’ and that you will often see it as:

  • I’d like to visit her. (= I would like to visit her).
  • They’d swim more often. (= They would swim more often)

‘Would Like’: Expressing a Desire for Something

OK.. that covers ‘would’ when we are talking about hypothetical situations but what if I say:

  • I’d like a cup of tea, please. (= I would like …)
  • She’d like a Tomato Salad. (= She would like …)

Here, ‘would‘ is used as an auxiliary for the verb ‘to like‘ and takes on a special function of expressing desire for something. Notice that you cannot use ‘could‘ in this way.

‘Would Have’ to talk about something in the past that did not happen

Now, if we want to talk about something in the past that did not happen, we use had + past participle in the if clause and would have in the main clause. Look at these examples:

  • If Simon had taken his passport, he wouldn’t have had a problem buying his ticket.
  • If Jenny and Max had remembered Mary’s birthday, she wouldn’t have been angry.
  • If I had lived in Australia I would have learned how to surf.

Hope your staying with this Mahesh – it’s a long posting as it has to cover quite a bit of territory so that you can really see where the differences are!

Now, lets look at ‘could’.

Could: Permission, requesting and expressing ability

We can use ‘could‘ to ask for permission, to express a possibility, make a request or express an ability to do something. Look at these examples:

  • Could I borrow your car this evening? Mine is being repaired.
  • You could take the train. Then you won’t have any problems parking.
  • Yes, I could but I don’t know where the train station is.
  • Jonas could play the violin very well by the age of five.

Could Have’ to talk about hypothetical actions in the past that did not happen.

Until now I think the distinct usages of ‘would’ and ‘could’ have been pretty clear but here, with ‘could have‘ I’m afraid we are moving into an area where ‘could have’ and ‘would have‘ are very similar!

Like would have, (and should have … which we are not covering in this posting), could have can be used to talk about past hypothetical actions – things we did not do or other did not do or didn’t succeed in doing. For example:

  • I could have gone to university if I had had better results at school.
  • I would have gone to university if I had had better results at school.

Now, in terms of meaning we are going to have to dig deep to find a distinction between the two but in the first example, ‘could have’ expresses an ability to have done something if the condition (getting better results at school) had been met. ‘Would have’ expresses a clear intention to have done something if the condition had been met – that is not just the ability to do it but also the intention to do it. Complicated I know but if you think through the examples I hope you will notice the difference.

I hope that’s helped and until next time.

A Present Perfect Marriage

[display_podcast]

Question from Sahra in Brazil:

What’s the difference between these sentences:
“I’m married for 3 years” and “I’ve been married for 3 years”?

Hi Sahra. This is a very quick one to answer as we have answered a lot of other questions about this subject and have sections of the English4Today Grammar on it as well.

When you see ‘for‘ with a period or duration of time – as in ‘for three years‘ or ‘for a long time‘ or ‘for two days‘ then you know that the verb will be in the Present Perfect.

We use the Present Perfect when we are talking about something started in the past and continuing in the present.

The structure of the the Present Perfect is:

SUBJECT + HAVE/HAS + PAST PARTICIPLE OF VERB

I + HAVE + BEEN MARRIED + FOR TEN YEARS

Your first sentence is therefore not correct and the second one is correct.

Take a look at these references and explanations: ·

Just in Time: Just + Present Perfect

[display_podcast]
Just in Time: Just + Present Perfect

Question from Henrik in Croatia:

I just called or I’ve just called? What’s right?
Stevie Wonder says: I just called to say I love you. Shouldn’t it be Present Perfect instead of Simple Past?

Using JUST with the Present Perfect
Hi Henrik, A couple of weeks ago I answered a similar question about the grammar used in song lyrics. That time it concerned the lyrics in an Akon song and if you look at the blog posting or Grammar FAQ posting you will be able to link through to that posting.

Although I’d say the same things as in the Akon post about lyrics using a more poetic and liberal and perhaps socio-cultural grammar I thought I’d answer this question as it does bring up one interesting grammatical usage and that is when JUST, an adverb of time, is used with the Present Perfect.

In previous posts I’ve said that the main use of the Present Perfect is to talk about actions started in the past and continuing or having a connection with the present, for example:

  • I have lived in Bombay for twenty years.
  • She has been married since 2005.

In both of these examples the action of living in Bombay or being married started at a point in the past but is still going on in the present.

But what about this sentence which also uses the Present Perfect:

  • I have just called to say I love you.

The adverb of time,just, indicates that this action is in the very recent past and is completed so why don’t we use the Simple Past (as Stevie Wonder does in the song).

Well, here we have one of those little grammatical twists that are sent to annoy us all but especially those who are trying to learn how English works.

You could use the Simple Past here and it would not be wrong.

What complicates it is that using ‘just’ with the Present Perfect to talk about a complete, recent past action is also correct. We often use it with the Present Perfect when there is result in the present or future of the past action.For example: •

  • I’ve just failed my exams and will have to study for them again.
  • She has just lost her car keys and can’t leave for work.

But we are talking about fairly fine distinctions here and I would say that Stevie Wonder’s grammar is spot on in this part of the song!

I just called to say I love you
I just called to say how much I care
I just called to say I love you
And I mean it from the bottom of my heart

Just to keep you thinking – just can also be used to mean the only reason. For example, ‘I just called to say I love you’ could also mean the only reason I called was to say I love you. I’ll leave you with that until next time!

See also: